Post #3957144
2026-07-20 09:54 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@TallSimon@mstdn.ca 2026-07-20 11:32
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social (I had to estimate because of bad resource use reporting in the original paper, but...) The last AI application I reimplemented with my own math ran on about 2.3 million times less resources and required ~3% of the data of the AI (not even LLM) original. Same data, same application, and I got better results. Then I realized I had a small oversight and could make my version at least 3 times faster. As Ed Zitron says, let AI burn.
-
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social 2026-07-20 09:57
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social ...maybe that prediction is already true for many large companies, running (chinese) open weight models on their own infrastructure, still those local models also need a lot of compute so it will be more redirection of available resource. Ofcourse companies like Anthropic and OpenAI could suffer
-
@nick_appleyard@mastodonapp.uk 2026-07-20 10:15
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social Or not at all.
-
@coreysnipes@hachyderm.io 2026-07-20 10:53
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social Agreed; this is the mostly likely post-correction reality. Ed Zitron says he's watching for data center / scaler capital expenditure pullbacks as the first signs of correction.