Post #3949551

@thedarktangent@defcon.social OK, thanks. I didn't read the whole thing but I assume that the whole point is that the mapping is surjective? That is to say, if we mapped all possible inputs to all possible outputs, the set of outputs would be at least potentially smaller? I'm looking for a rationale as to why the data set is compressible at all and this seems reasonable at least. Damn. I used to know this stuff.