Post #39411
2025-12-07 20:13 UTC
Given the stochastic nature of LLMs and the pseudo-darwinian nature of their training process, I sometimes wonder if geneticists wouldn’t be more suited to interpreting LLM output than programmers.
Replies (1)
-
@dsilverz@calckey.world 2025-12-07 20:58
@Jayjader@jlai.lu @technology@lemmy.world Given how it's very akin to dynamic and chaotic systems (e.g. double pendulum, whose initial position, mass and length rules the movement of the pendulum, very similar to how the initial seed and input rule the output of generative AIs) due to the insurmountable amount of physically intertwined factors and the possibility of generalizing the system in mathematical, differential terms, I'd say that the more fit would be a physicist. Or a mathematician. lol As always, relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/435/