Elektrine lite

← Feed

@felbane@lemmy.world

Post #39244

2025-12-07 19:14 UTC

As someone who has been shoved in the direction of using AI for coding by my superiors, that’s been my experience as well. It’s fine at cranking out stackoverflow-level code regurgitation and mostly connecting things in a sane way if the concept is simple enough. The real breakthrough would be if the corrections you make would persist longer than a turn or two. As soon as your “fix-it prompt” is out of the context window, you’re effectively back to square one. If you’re expecting it to “learn” you’re gonna have a bad time. If you’re not constantly double checking its output, you’re gonna have a bad time.

Replies (1)

  • @oscarjiminy@aus.social 2025-12-08 01:22

    @felbane@lemmy.world @AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world i don't have a cs degree (and am more than willing to accept the conclusions of this piece) but how is it not viable to audit code as it's produced so as it's both vetted and understood in sequence?

    Open ##40335