@Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
Post #3820349
2026-07-14 23:01 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@Feyd@programming.dev 2026-07-14 23:55
llm could be useful for helping product folks translate their thoughts into actionable items In my experience it makes them give me an essay instead of 10 lines of bullet points and I have you spend an hour asking questions to whittle it down to 10 lines of a bullet points
-
@surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2026-07-15 00:13
We’re trying to replace product with LLM. Honestly, I welcome it.
-
@rozodru@piefed.world 2026-07-15 11:44
even just using it to translate their thoughts into a bullet list isn’t going to work most of the time. LLMs training is, the majority of the time, out of date and stacks change/move faster than an agents data. Plus LLMs favour things that have been posted about on blogs, linkedin posts, etc rather than stuff that is proven and tested. Like for example it might suggest using a language or library that is insanely out of date or just won’t work but recommends it based purely on say blog posts that have talked a lot about it or it’s potential to do something that it currently can’t do. or like I said it’ll suggest something that’s out of date simply because there’s more documentation online about that specific version than the most up to date version. Or the LLM will report on something that has a “known issue” from like early 2025 and suggests not using it when said issue has been patched routinely since then because the data the LLM has is out of date. the data is constantly out of date.
-
@Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 2026-07-15 11:49
“it’s fine, he doesn’t need to know how to use the controls. We just installed a voice command system into the excavator.”