Post #3690296
2026-07-09 08:49 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@atarifrosch@fedifreu.de 2026-07-09 08:52
@buersten@mastodon.social @DrJLecter@beige.party Das schreiben sie ja schon rein, sonst wüßte ich das gar nicht.
-
@DrJLecter@beige.party 2026-07-09 10:09
@buersten@mastodon.social I sent a reply to that and I got another answer: "Hello, thank you for your elaborate answer explaining TGTG's stance. I can see how there are advantages for the company, but in my opinion it fails to take into account the overall cost of the entire AI industry. Yes, generating a few images might cost less water and energy now, but the tech giants are still destroying our planet for it. Data centers ruining whole regions, stealing water, prolonging the existence of gas and oil and even nuclear plants. It doesn't matter that for you it's just a few pictures. The overall result of it is the AI industry destroying our planet, our democracy and underminding human rights and you are part of it. Your AI creating these pictures was trained with cheap click workers in Africa, Asia and South America without rights, just like every other AI. Once again, thank you for your reply, but it has not changed my mind." The reply I got to that: "Thank you for your thoughtful follow-up. I completely respect your perspective on the broader impacts of the AI industry, and I’ve made sure your feedback is shared directly with our sustainability and leadership teams. We truly appreciate you holding us accountable and being such a passionate advocate for the planet." 🤪🙈 @atarifrosch@fedifreu.de