Post #3665892
2026-07-08 06:50 UTC
@kevinthomas@defcon.social please show us a $5 voltage glitcher and describe some chips youve successfully used one on :catjam: youre making some bold claims here that run contrary to my experience in hardware reversing.
i think these bold claims combined with your insistence on refusing to offer technical proofs for the claims in your submission is why it was rejected.
you sound like a charlatan, and hey maybe you arent, but nothing youre writing here, nothing in the github repo you link for the rp2350 implementation, nothing in your suspiciously overly populated tutorial content, convinces me that you arent. id have rejected such a submission with the same rationale.
the transition from "they rejected my submission and said it didnt contain convincing proof!" to "theyre blindly trusting secure boot" is not... a convincing series of words to say back to back lmao. it makes me think youre just full of shit and unwilling to engage with anyone not letting you get away with it. why approach an academic circle with this if you feel this way about them? this kind of behavior reminds me of charlatans who have graced the scene before.
again, maybe im wrong, but this is the perception i get.
Replies (1)
-
@kevinthomas@defcon.social 2026-07-08 08:47
@0x00string@infosec.exchange I appreciate your thoughts. I spent over a decade making free tutorials on RE covering a wide variety of ARCHs. I also put in a lot of time getting this encryption engine together with the hopes of advancing embedded security. I have not asked for money for either of these and simply want to help in small ways and that is what I am trying to do. Judge me as you see fit.