Post #3660092
2026-07-07 01:14 UTC
@FritzAdalis@infosec.exchange More fundamentally, https://web.archive.org/web/20250528213926/https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf-llc-statement-competition-law-issues/ says the following: "IETF activities are conducted with extreme transparency, in public forums. Decision-making requires achieving broad consensus via these public processes." IETF also labels every RFC from every WG as "consensus of the IETF community". The more people we have speaking up, the more obvious it is that what happened here wasn't consensus (even if they try to claim it was "rough consensus", whatever exactly that means).
Replies (1)
-
@FritzAdalis@infosec.exchange 2026-07-07 20:21
@djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to I was thinking of the message at https://infosec.exchange/@sophieschmieg/116852736472562657, and rfc7282 seems to describe a variation of this scenario.