Post #3655185
2026-07-07 16:52 UTC
@ddbeck@mastodon.social I mean we did have doctypes for that reason, right?
Replies (1)
-
@ddbeck@mastodon.social 2026-07-07 17:04
@bkardell@toot.cafe it's been a while since I've looked at the '90s docs but I thought the original doctype was also unversioned? Something rather close to ``?