Post #3593778
2026-07-05 00:25 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@mikalai@privacysafe.social 2026-07-05 00:32
@rsalz@ioc.exchange @letoams@defcon.social If I let standards body to do things I think insecure, sounds like I am responsible to speak up to chairs in said standards body. Hence, here I am. Why are you surprised? Don't remove mentions to interested groups. They should know what kinds of arguments will be quick fired at them when they will be protecting public interests. @djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to @pluralistic@mamot.fr @eff@mastodon.social
-
@mikalai@privacysafe.social 2026-07-05 00:52
@rsalz@ioc.exchange Are you suggesting, that (1) as a chair in IETF WG, (2) given @letoams@defcon.social mentioning that IETF position is to recommend hybrid crypto approach, (3) now being aware that RECOMMENDED=N will be overlooked, almost certainly, espesially with parallel recomendations/mandates from government(s), (4) you want to shift any responsibility, and future blame, on unsuspecting CSO's and developers? Knowing that they will be squizeed by your IETF stuff, and aforementioned requirements. @djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to