Post #3576187
2026-06-30 12:03 UTC
@neverpanic@chaos.social @katzenmann@c3d2.social
Every reader can see that the first link has a "not impacting anyone else" claim as I said, that the second link has an "only benefit is protection if ML-DSA is classically broken before the CRQCs come" claim as I said, that your accusations are unfounded, and that you're throwing a temper tantrum rather than addressing the content.
Replies (1)
-
@neverpanic@chaos.social 2026-06-30 13:23
@djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to I respectfully decline to discuss with you. Calling that a tantrum is just the kind of style people have come to expect from you.