@Weizenbaum_Institut@social.bund.de
Post #3550934
2026-07-01 07:45 UTC
๐ค Is the traditional lecture still relevant in the age of Generative AI?
On 6 July (16:30โ18:00 CET), Prof. Gila Kurtz will explore how GenAI is reshaping higher education in our hybrid Colloquium: "Is the Lecture Dead? Redesigning Learning in the Age of Generative AI."
What is the role of educators when answers are instant, but understanding is not?
๐ Hybrid: Weizenbaum Institute & Zoom
๐ More information: https://www.weizenbaum-institut.de/veranstaltungen/detailseite/gila-kurtz-is-the-lecture-dead-redesigning-learning-in-the-age-of-generative-ai/
๐ Zoom-Link: https://weizenbaum-institut-de-wi.zoom-x.de/j/62148637282?pwd=NO2HxRZ37tYVKwdRDEM9bkhdrQNeGg.1
#GenAI
Replies (1)
-
@quincy@chaos.social 2026-07-01 07:47
@Weizenbaum_Institut@social.bund.de No, please, no. What nonsense! That isn't even a useful question. There is no "age of generative AI". That's vastly overstating the significance of this ghastly and senseless fad. Bullshit generators have no bearing on the relevance of lectures, libraries, research, etc. - why should they? Just because they extrude answer-shaped strings?