Post #3542326

Regarding the validity of at:// URIs in atproto: https://bnewbold.leaflet.pub/3mph4hzvbdc2v We have a similar problem with FEP-ef61 'ap' URIs. In their canonical form, they are not valid RFC-3986 URIs. I think if atproto devs decide to move away from ://did:.. syntax, we'll have to do that as well. #fep_ef61