← Feed
@trondhjort@hachyderm.io
Post #3528675
2026-06-24 06:24 UTC
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day
The learning organisation that doesn't learn
Context: The organisation has committed to becoming a learning organisation. There are lunch-and-learns, communities of practice, knowledge-sharing sessions, and a learning management system with hundreds of courses. People are encouraged to spend time on development. A few do. Most do not have time, because the work does not stop. The knowledge shared in the sessions rarely changes how the work is done. The retrospectives identify the same issues quarter after quarter. The post-mortems produce action items that get deprioritised. The organisation talks about learning continuously. Its structure ensures it mostly does not.
OST explains: Genuine organisational learning requires three things that DP1 systematically prevents: people must be able to set their own goals, receive accurate feedback on their work, and act on what they learn without waiting for approval from above. In DP1, goals come from outside the group, feedback travels up the hierarchy before it can be acted on, and changes to how work is done require sign-off from management. The result is that learning happens individually and occasionally, but rarely changes the system. DP2 is inherently a learning structure: self-managing groups set their own goals, own their feedback loops, and control how they adjust their work. Learning is not a programme they attend. It is what the structure produces continuously. The learning management system is not the problem. It is a symptom of an organisation trying to buy learning that its structure prevents.
#OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #leadership
Replies (1)
-
Organisational Dysfunction of the Day
Permanent urgency
Context: Everything is urgent. The backlog is full of high priorities. Every quarter brings a new set of critical initiatives. People are context-switching constantly, barely finishing one thing before the next emergency arrives. There is no time to reflect, refactor, learn, or plan properly. Leadership acknowledges this is not ideal but frames it as the nature of the industry or the market. The pace is presented as a sign of ambition. People are tired in a way that a long weekend does not fix.
OST explains: Permanent urgency is what a DP1 structure produces when it has no mechanism for deciding what not to do. Prioritisation lives above the team: someone outside the group determines what is critical, and the team executes. When everything coming down is labelled urgent, the team has no structural way to push back, because pushing back requires owning the goals, not just the delivery. The six psychological requirements for productive work include adequate variety and continual learning, both of which require time that is not committed. A team running at permanent capacity cannot learn, cannot reflect, and cannot improve. It can only execute until the people in it stop being able to. The exhaustion is not a sign of ambition. It is a sign that the structure has no off switch.
#OpenSystemsTheory #SocioTechnical #OrgDesign #agile
Open ##3528674