Post #3504428
2026-06-30 15:23 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 2026-07-01 04:55
I would push back against this framing a little bit. I feel as if the idea that Iranian hijab is not enforced and therefore many women are without, is in many ways a way of appealing to the liberals and watering down the nature of the revolution. Hijab is enforced for people who represent the nation and appear on state television and hold office. I think this is great (hijab is also defining men’s clothing too but idk if westerners even know that). Holding onto it is a visible and tangible way to reject westoxification and reject liberalism. This isnt the place to enumerate but the position of the martyred Leader was that it should be heavily encouraged but nobody should be berated or attacked for not wearing good hijab. Here is link: english.khamenei.ir/news/9390 I don’t really expect many people here to grasp the nuances of what is being expressed though. But I categorically reject the idea that people who support compulsory hijab are backwards conservatives etc. There is a famous letter from Fanon to Ali Shariati where he observes that the characteristics of Islam make it uniquely capable of countering westernized cultural domination. In many ways “hijab is a fortress against cultural imperialism” I believe that, instead, it is these western xenophobic clowns that are the reactionaries. The takfiris like isis/al qaeda do not represent Islam but idk if war on terror brain allows people to understand that.