Post #3445177

@madcoder@infosec.exchange My opinion on this is: it's about who takes responsibility, blame for the code written. If you see "LLM wrote this" then whoever prompted the LLM isn't gonna take any blame for when the code is shit (only take credit when it's good). If it's shit it'll be like "go figure that out with the LLM. it probably just halucinated i'm not at fault". If a human takes responsibility (blame) for code i don't care if he used LLM or not. If it's good ok, if it's shit i'm never trusting him again