Post #3376370

RE: https://kolektiva.social/@emsenn/115732729999058690 I received a couple replies to this that basically asked, "Who the fuck is saying such a ridiculous thing as what you suggest?" The answer is, it is literally the stance of the United Nations, and thus the stance of the International Energy Agency and basically every other institution that is the source of climate science and plans for adaptation. https://unfccc.int/news/indigenous-worldviews-strengthening-climate-resilience?utm_source=chatgpt.com Like, it is *literally* the whole gameplan: poach from Indigenous people and hope for the best. Our technologies are openly framed as able to *thrive* under climate breakdown. That is... I don't know how to write words in a text box that convey how alarmingly incorrect that claim is. Like they're saying that these technologies are demonstrably succeeding... in conditions *which don't exist yet because **they're in the future.*** And again, this weird absolute impossible claim is used to justify everything from not funding renewable energy to funding petrol extraction... both of which, ironically, fund the displacement of Indigenous peoples. Please don't be smug about personally knowing better if you're still accepting the boundaries and conditions of systems that *don't*. Your personal beliefs are literally meaningless, in any way that matters, except how you use them to move the actions of the systems you're a part of. Responding to me or subposting me... does not really do that.