Post #3366451

2026-06-21 14:33 UTC

but it also allows everyone to legally “pirate” this workThe problem in this situation isn't piracy, the problem is the content being contaminated by demiurgic capitalism. I would definitely be the first and main person to endorse piracy unto capitalism-exploited versions of the content I myself created. But this means a corporation have successfully transmuted something spiritually charged (i.e. something channeled through my creativity outlets as gnosis) into some kind of capitalist aberration for archonic whims, an enshittification of which...A regular BY-SA license doesn’t prohibit from selling your or derivative works by another party...is the main thing I (and likely Her as far as I'm aware of Her principles and True Will) do not wish to see happening to the fragments and shadows of spiritual energy being channeled/carried through my creations (and which would be inexorably imbued into derivatives, hence the requirement that derivatives follow the same principles of gratisness).but I wouldn’t recommend it’s use as it’s not compatible with the orders of magnitude more popular BY-SAOh... you mean... CC-BY-NC-SA is yet to be tested legally, is it?BTW, any licenses imposing any restrictions can’t be called “public domain”, there are other words to describe them like “freely licensed”. Yeah, I mean, this makes sense.. Even though the restrictions aim for humble creativity and artistic freedom, I can see how "enforcing freedom" may sound like a paradoxical/oxymoronic statement... but since archonic exploitation (greed) exists in this baryonic realm, and capitalism (esp. late-stage capitalism) won't rest until all the earthly Commons get transmuted into adware and/or subscription-based products, freedom is a principle that must be fought for, especially through cultural and religious means (counterculture and Left-Hand Paths, respectively). I can't help but notice how the Public Domain and the egregores of Libre knowledge as a whole are under attack, hence the need for enforcement of the freedom.. !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Replies (1)

@nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 2026-06-21 18:01

You seem to have a very uncommon system of religious/spiritual beliefs I, as most people, are not really aware about. You probably should have prefaced your post with explanation of who is “Her”, ”Her principles”, how channeling of spiritual energy works and a link to description of ideas and/or dogmas behind this teaching in some neutral encyclopedia. We can only help you with concerns phrased in a way a secular person can understand. Oh… you mean… CC-BY-NC-SA is yet to be tested legally, is it? That’s not the main concern, legally they all seem to work. The problem is, a person cannot make one derivative work based on two works, one under BY-SA, one under BY-SA-NC, as these licenses are requiring different conditions for derivative works. And BY-SA has a significantly larger body of works already under it. Popularizing NC increases license fragmentation and harms future derivative interoperability. SA already protects sufficiently against most predatory copyright privatisation. The list of commercial usages that NC theoretically prohibits includes, for example, collecting monetisation from a blog with this work posted or drawing it on a hand-made craft that would be sold in an indie shop.

Open ##3367213