@PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
Post #3362693
2026-06-20 21:39 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 2026-06-21 13:16
Ah ok this makes it clear it is not Engels who has a misunderstanding but you. But surely everyone can tell the difference between, say, a kingdom, and collective decisionmaking. Obviously but the difference is not that of authority but of form. The collective decision will be just as authoritarian on the minority who disagree as the kingdom is to those not integrated into the power structure. should sooner listen to the anarchist arguments, which also criticize the inherent authoritarianism in capitalism. One doesn’t even need to be an anarchist to engage with that. The anarchist definition of hierarchy (and thus authority) constantly shifts to accommodate whatever hierarchy anarchists currently want to defend as “not really hierarchy” or “justified authority” or “expertise” or “coordination.” Parent and child, doctor and patient, teacher and student, elected militia command, workplace coordination, revolutionary defense, public health measures, collective discipline: suddenly these are not hierarchy, because even anarchists know society cannot function without structured authority.
-
@KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 2026-06-21 14:34
Authority, in the sense in which the word is used here, means: the imposition of the will of another upon ours; on the other hand, authority presupposes subordination. Now, since these two words sound bad, and the relationship which they represent is disagreeable to the subordinated party, the question is to ascertain whether there is any way of dispensing with it, whether — given the conditions of present-day society — we could not create another social system, in which this authority would be given no scope any longer, and would consequently have to disappear. Sounds like Engels does have a good grasp