Post #3351301
2026-06-12 10:23 UTC
Yeah, I was reading the comment before and anyone with a vague awareness of this stuff should have called bullshit immediately.
Preserving the argument seemed an innocuous enough change though, so I could see why it was accepted, but the explanation was bafflingly stupid.
But people who don't know eat it up. Sounded possible (until they claimed the system crashed and could not log the error, despite a log entry belt there that they ostensibly cite as the issue..).
Replies (1)
-
@victorz@lemmy.world 2026-06-12 11:23
I just don't understand the workflow with these people. You know how people say "don't run a command you are given or find online unless you know exactly what it does"? Why would anyone accept/merge a PR from an LLM unless they knew what the consequences were, or verified its claims. I just will never get this trust in LLMs, given I know even _vaguely_ how they work.