Post #3344898
2026-06-10 20:27 UTC
Replies (13)
-
@jumjummy@lemmy.world 2026-06-11 00:17
Remember that Lemmy, and this sub in particular, is absolutely rabidly anti-AI. It’s like the Jellyfin vs Plex thing dialed up to 111
-
@CyanideShotInjection@lemmy.world 2026-06-10 20:32
To me, someone who doesn’t even care about planning something as simple as a date, it’s an indicator they won’t care about most thing in the relationship and will try to ChatGPT their problems away.
-
@Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2026-06-10 22:39
Nah, now he knows for next time. The point of a relationship is to get to know the other person, not the soulless imitation of whatever bullshit this program scraped off the internet.
-
@lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml 2026-06-10 21:18
If someone needs/wants to use AI to do extremely simple things like plan their date activities, that's a good indication that they are an exceedingly uninteresting and unengaging person overall. They can't even do the simple things, so the hard stuff in life is going to be insurmountable and they'll be a massive burden on their friends and partner(s). Where's the incentive to "give them a chance" in this scenario? The books at home are the better option by far.
-
@Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 2026-06-10 20:41
Why does someone likely in their 40's need to give someone a chance, particularly someone that thoughtless?
-
@TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 2026-06-10 20:54
AI is a little different than coke vs Pepsi dude but sure. There are for sure things where you can know you’re not compatible with someone and being dependent on AI can be a pretty big flag. It’s not her job to fix him just so he’d dateable.
-
@AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2026-06-10 21:35
For me, I'm enough against the casual use of AI that someone who does what he did is like someone who has significantly different political views than me. AI data centers take obscene amounts of energy and water. I'm very much in favor of, for instance, machine learning applications being used to identify diseases in pathology slides. That's something that can help humanity to an extent that it's likely worth the resources. But to suggest plans for a date? That's nauseating.
-
@Tippy@sh.itjust.works 2026-06-10 21:41
No one has to do anything or is obligated to give someone a chance at the early level of dating implied in this image. At that point, you are interacting with someone you *do not know* and it is socially acceptable for either party to end things clearly if that is what feels right and comfortable for them. AI usage is not some simple ethically clean topic akin to choosing a favorite soda like you claim, and it's weird that you even tried to compare those things. Having strong opinions on that topic, or any other major controversial topic, and choosing not to engage with someone due to differing views on that topic, is fine and expected. You claiming dating is stupid, that you feel defensive about it and have to be on edge, and then victim blaming the woman in this scenario for doing nothing wrong all come to together to paint a really unhealthy picture. I sincerely hope you can work through what you have going on and, if you so choose, find someone right for you that makes the relationship feel rewarding.
-
@ZDL@lazysoci.al 2026-06-11 08:59
I think we spotted the slop-gobbler here.
-
@aoidenpa@lemmy.world 2026-06-11 11:21
Cogsucker.
-
@zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2026-06-12 00:09
I think she made how she felt about AI pretty clear. Now, if there's something about him that still attracts her, then yes... give him another chance. Absent that, have him hit the road. Don't ignore such an obvious red flag unless you have a damn good reason.
-
@Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-06-11 20:34
Man you have angered the anti ai people
-
@Starik@lemmy.world 2026-06-10 22:57
Agreed. Not liking LLMs is fine (and might make for an interesting discussion topic over dinner!), but this is petty. She was looking for an excuse to reject before being rejected, or maybe wasn’t very attracted to him to begin with.