Post #3341938
2026-06-18 00:30 UTC
I did read the article dickbag.
Replies (1)
-
@akwd169@sh.itjust.works 2026-06-18 01:44
Then how are you unable to understand? Are you stupid? It says very clearly that overall its considered a sink because the expected rate of carbon release over the next 75 years is lower than the expected rate of sequestration due to new plant growth Therefore its an overall carbon sink retard