Post #3246841
2025-03-20 20:45 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@Wortex17@mastodon.gamedev.place 2025-03-20 22:13
@VulcanTourist@autistics.life @ntnsndr@social.coop he can be here, can talk shit and he can even grow an audience, but he cannot, by definition, take over the network and run the show. On the contrary, he can be isolated, banned from parts of the network, diminshing any benefit of being here in the first place
-
@paulsilver@mastodon.me.uk 2025-03-20 22:37
@VulcanTourist@autistics.life @ntnsndr@social.coop Trump's Truth Social network runs on a version of Mastodon under the hood. No one federates with it. Something similar will hopefully happen when the rich techbros turn up, but do doubt there will be arguments about it
-
@LovesTha@floss.social 2025-03-21 07:07
@VulcanTourist@autistics.life @ntnsndr@social.coop no it isn't the paradox of tolerance, instances and users don't have to tolerate a Musk account.
-
@LukefromDC@kolektiva.social 2025-03-26 05:56
@VulcanTourist@autistics.life @ntnsndr@social.coop Well, the infection would be quickly quarantined and walled off. It would be like an old cyst that doesn't go away but cannot infect the rest of the body. More precisely he would be a cyst in the body of only one person out of a community, like when the body walls off tuberculosis and it becomes inactive, causing no symptoms and no longer transmissable.