Post #3241175
2023-03-20 14:07 UTC
@mgaruccio@hachyderm.io @davew@mastodon.social @mike@flipboard.social This is because some people are going beyond exchanging pictures of kittens. It seems that the use cases in Gaia-X where such that the DNS system wasn't good enough for their requirements.
Especially as the stateless assumption domain == you own/are that domain does not persist over time. The stance that this isn't good enough comes from the manufacturing industry and from academia.
Replies (1)
-
@mgaruccio@hachyderm.io 2023-03-20 14:15
@rigo@mamot.fr @davew@mastodon.social @mike@flipboard.social We “went beyond exchanging pictures of kittens” in the 90’s. The current system is considered secure enough for banking, e-commerce, medical data… effectively all of human existence online. What makes DNS insecure? Are there any examples of a successful, or even hypothetical, exploitation of that flaw?