Post #3232843

2026-06-09 06:39 UTC

Can someone really be considered neutral if they believe that one side in the war tells the truth and the other side only lies? That is like the typical reaction from one side when a neutral referee gives a penalty to the other team. At some points he has to make decisions which are in favor of one or the other, that’s why he’s there. Provide your unbiased source. But to me, it’s obvious that the casualties since 2022 far exceed those from the 8 years of conflict between 2014 and 2022 Will do when I have time. The fighting and most of the damage is done in the east. That’s not true either. the central regions are targeted by strikes on an daily basis. While there can be hits anywhere, even daily, there is no comparing these strikes on specific targets to the complete villages and some cities that are totally in ruins. There is the frontline and that is where most of the damage is done.

Replies (1)

@Shatur@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-06-09 09:24

This is how I understand what you are saying: I'm neutral. I just think that if Russia causes any casualties, it is either by accident or because there was a legitimate military target nearby. But if Ukraine target civilians - it's on purpose. Will do when I have time. You either have it or not, otherwise your so-called facts based on nothing. To me thinking that the conflict after the coup in 2014 caused more casualties than a full-blow war is absolutely ridiculous. there is no comparing these strikes on specific targets to the complete villages This is correct. But you previously said that casualties caused by Russia are anecdotal, so I assumed you mean that outside of the west people don’t feel the war.

Open ##3232842