Post #3232841
2026-06-09 10:38 UTC
This is how I understand what you are saying
You understand wrong. It’s not what I ‘think’, it’s the empirical overwhelming evidence that forms an objective opinion, even if you don’t like it.
You either have it or not, otherwise your so-called facts based on nothing
The numbers after 2022 change over time since it’s still going on.
Obviously the pre-2022 was higher for a considerable time.
Maybe now the post-2022 have indeed caught up and you are right.
The reported casualties make no distinction between what side they are from and even then they vary depending on who reports them.
This is correct. But you previously said that casualties caused by Russia are anecdotal, so I assumed you mean that outside of the west people don’t feel the war.
You probably ment outside of the west east people don’t feel the war.
I never said that, again the destruction and casualties are obviously much higher closer to the frontline.
That is in the east.
And of course they would feel it in the west.
But for the 3rd time, it’s in no way comparable.
And civilian casualty numbers are very limited considering the firepower used.
I don’t see ‘refugees’ here going back on holidays to their homes (if it’s even there), unlike the ones from the west.
Replies (1)
-
@Shatur@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-06-09 14:01
Even if you combine the casualties from both sides before 2022, they still wouldn’t be even a fraction of what has happened during the full-scale war, no matter which source you choose to use. I’m not even sure why you decided to mention this. Yeah, I misspoke about the east. But define “very limited”. For example, last night, Russia hit about 20 houses. I’m not saying it was deliberate, but did you somehow calculated that fraction of casualties/firepower caused by Ukraine is higher than Russia’s? Or do you just think that all casualties caused by Russia, like the attack on Okhmatdyt children’s hospital, were accidental, while all attacks done by Ukraine, like the college one, were intentional?