Post #3222274
2026-04-27 06:33 UTC
@sarahalang@fedihum.org I didn't bother going to last year's DH conference, and that was in part because I felt from the reviewer comments that the workflow I was hoping to present was either just going to get pointless "why isn't this using LLMs" questions thrown at it all weekend or was going to get no interest: the bandwagon approach to these things is very tiring and I wish we spent more of our time as DH people thinking sharply about what tools do, including to our thinking, and how they do that.
Replies (2)
-
@JubalBarca@scholar.social 2026-04-27 06:36
@sarahalang@fedihum.org In any case - this is a really good post, thank you for sharing it!
-
@mia@hcommons.social 2026-04-27 07:50
@JubalBarca@scholar.social @sarahalang@fedihum.org that's a shame - it might have been well-received at the conference itself. I haven't submitted to the computational humanities conference but the DH conference reviewers often don't reflect ADHO conference attendees as much as they do their own local disciplines.