Post #320537

Is the PDF viewer on the ACM DL wrong, or does the original QuickCheck paper have terrible kerning? https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/351240.351266 Downloading the PDF from the ACM DL also results in a PDF with visual artifacts and overlapping letters, but this one is fine: https://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/cs257/archive/john-hughes/quick.pdf Has the ACM DL started passing PDFs through some buggy filter?