Post #3169476
2025-07-28 18:05 UTC
@patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social @SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social When we are auditing videos, our evaluation is solely based on the question whether all relevant information is conveyed through audio. This can be, of course, an AD, but if the regular audio track does already fulfill this purpose (in most cases: a narrator talking, visuals are just decorative), we also consider this passing the SC. If the video has no audio gaps for the AD (while there is additional visual information conveyed), we consider the lack of pauses as irrelevant and thus a violation of 1.2.3 and 1.2.5. We recommend our clients to take care of this during production of the video.
Replies (1)
-
@patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social 2025-07-28 18:07
well, according to some of the authors of that SC, you (and I) are wrong here and the gaps make it pass... 🫠