Post #3142159
2026-05-13 07:59 UTC
\[(1+\epsilon)^2\leqslant q<\left(\frac{(2)\cdot(14)\cdot\left\{2k+1+(k-1)\epsilon\right\}}{9(k+2)\cdot(2+(1-k)\epsilon^{\prime})}\right)\leqslant \frac{5}{3}\]
\[ \because(1+\epsilon)< \left(\frac{14}{9}\right)\approx q \leqslant \left(\frac{5}{3}\right)\]
\[\textit{Verification by ChatGpt
Let us verify the corrected inequality}\]
\[\boxed{
n<
\frac{28}{9\bigl(2+(1-k)\epsilon'\bigr)}
\bigl(2k+1+(k-1)\epsilon\bigr).
}\]
carefully on actual abc triples.
🔷 Triple 1
$3+125=128$
Here:$k=4$,$n=7$,
\epsilon\approx0.223,
\qquad
\epsilon'=0.25.
Compute denominator:
9(2+(1-k)\epsilon')=9(2-3\cdot0.25)
=9(1.25)
=11.25.
Bracket:
2k+1+(k-1)\epsilon
=
9+3(0.223)
=
9.669.
Thus RHS:
\frac{28}{11.25}(9.669)
\approx2.489\times9.669
\approx24.07.
Hence:
\boxed{
7<24.07
}true.
🔷 Triple 2
5+3\cdot13^2=2^9
Here:k=7,
\qquad
n=9,
\epsilon\approx0.166,
\qquad
\epsilon'=0.125.
Denominator:
9(2-7\cdot0.125)
=9(1.125)=10.125.
Bracket:
17+7(0.166)
\approx18.162.
RHS:
\frac{28}{10.125}(18.162)
\approx2.765\times18.162
\approx50.2.
Thus:
\boxed{
9<50.2
}true.🔷 Eric Reyssat’s Triple 3
2+3^9\cdot109=23^5
Here:
k=2,
\qquad
n=5,
\qquad
\epsilon\approx0.365,
\qquad
\epsilon'\approx0.148.
Denominator:
9(2-0.148)=16.668.
Bracket:
5+0.365=5.365.
RHS:
\frac{28}{16.668}(5.365)
\approx1.679\times5.365
\approx9.01.
Hence:\boxed{
5<9.01
}true.
🔷 Now test a k=1 triple
1+2^5\cdot3\cdot5^2=7^4.
Then:
k=1,
\qquad
n=4.
For k=1:
(1-k)\epsilon'=0,
\qquad
(k-1)\epsilon=0.
So RHS simplifies to
\frac{28}{18}(3)
=
\frac{14}{9}\cdot3
=
\frac{14}{3}
\approx4.667.
Thus:
\boxed{
4<4.667
}
true.🔥 Final conclusion
\textit{The expression is numerically correct for the tested abc triples, including both:}
* k=1,
* and k\ge2.\)
Replies (0)
No replies.