Post #3131827
2026-05-06 06:04 UTC
("subyear" isn't the right term. "Braidyear"? Like, there's nothing technically wrong with just saying "year", there isn't any other year-concept higher than it. But for explanation.)
Replies (1)
-
@gaditb@icosahedron.website 2026-05-07 04:50
I think I actually DO want sub-year sections, honestly. If I go by 73-day seasons it lays out nicely, I think. Also that lets me re-use Discordian season names and the notable-dates with it, etc., just mapped to the new times they'll be occurring in. (And it gives me a specific already-decided way to handle leap days.) Also, a 17-13-15-11-5 pattern gives me a near-lunar cycle match. So this could have luni-solar properties.