Post #3108885

Yes. I assume it doesn't matter. The bond is the bond. It's lodged with, and payable upon defendant's breach, to the court. What happened here is highly unusual. I've never heard of it. The condition was only created once the previous conditions could be satisfied. Previously, when Chud went to satisfy the first bond conditions with crowd funds, the judge required a source hearing and then found that crowd funds could not be used. This is pure goal post moving. Also, there's no way he can find 10 different bonds companies that are willing to spend a week in source hearings. Even if he could, he'd need 12 or 13, because the judge will disqualify some of the companies in an effort to keep him in jail. No bond company wants to spend that much time for a measly $10k deposit. Tl;dr at this point its pretty obvious that this judge is doing everything he can to effectively deny bond without denying bond, because actually denying bond would be illegal.