@mostlyphysics@fediscience.org
Post #3096725
2025-09-04 07:46 UTC
@brembs@mastodon.social @crazyeddie@mastodon.social @neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social Why would we want to “bring a huge fraction of the scholarly literature to ORE”..? It is not an aggregator or an archive, it is a platform for publishing original work.
Replies (1)
-
@brembs@mastodon.social 2025-09-04 08:04
@mostlyphysics@fediscience.org @crazyeddie@mastodon.social @neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social I'm not sure I follow? Is the scholarly literature not "original work"? When should an article move into an "archive" and how long should an article remain on "the platform"? Because I don't see the difference between older and brand new articles, I don't weant to see them in separated silos. It feels to me, the scholarly literature should be in one silo and this is also what we envisage here: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230206 Can you explain?