Post #3096695

2025-09-03 15:12 UTC

@brembs@mastodon.social I'm not sure I had seen it. But I'm afraid after looking at several pages, I'm still confused as to what "the transition" is. I mean, I guess from ORE to ORE 2.0, but what does that mean? Does it mean that soon any researchers in Europe can publish there, instead of only people reporting results from Horizon (etc) grants? Looking everything over, I don't particularly like the "you can go back and edit the paper at any time in the future" aspect. And I think there are some serious structural issues with open review (yes, anonymous review also has problems, but they are different problems). Before I knew about those two aspects, I thought "ok, in the future, I'll send nearly everything there!" Now I'm less excited, but I'm still interested to try it out.

Replies (2)

@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz 2025-09-03 20:12

@skyglowberlin@fediscience.org @brembs@mastodon.social Like citations in wikipedia which have the access date added. Or posts here in Mastodon, which are editable, but a boost is for a specific version. Better enable live papers with incorporated but tracked erratums, than virtually invisible erratums or retractions. #ScientificPublishing

Open ##3096696
@brembs@mastodon.social 2025-09-04 07:22

@skyglowberlin@fediscience.org It is my understanding that every author in the listed countries should be able to publish in ORE without fees starting 2026. At least this bis what I'm going to assume and try out come January.

Open ##3096701