Post #3068904
2026-05-16 17:29 UTC
What I often see missing in discussions about AI (especially the current LLM centered discussions, AI is way more to be honest) is the context analysis:
- Oh, oops, see what bad things happened because of AI.
- Yeah, right, the AI might be an enabler, but if you behaved like that with a human instead of an AI, the outcome would have been as bad. Risky behavior/business processes don't become safe just because you trust some random dude not to be a serial killer.
Replies (1)
-
@yacc143@mastodon.social 2026-05-16 17:29
To put it differently, if you trust things that some random dude says without checking/validating them, my answer to that would be “They eat the dogs; they eat the cats.” I've got news for you: humans lie. It's a human survival strategy that works. People lie on their timesheets. The GOP even acknowledges that they lie because it works in the polls. But some random machine that you know to have issues with that—you expect it to be telling the truth by default? What is even the truth?