Post #3047040
2026-06-02 11:16 UTC
Replies (11)
-
@liaizon@social.wake.st 2026-06-02 11:32
Do we need to have a CEO of Wikipedia? Can we maybe just not?
-
@ehproque@neopaquita.es 2026-06-02 12:12
@liaizon@social.wake.st the next one will be a Palantir exec, followed by a Kissinger-head-in-a-jar
-
@kouett@soc.kouett.net.eu.org 2026-06-02 12:26
@liaizon@social.wake.st istg wmf management is so fucking out of touch. why do they keep hiring these office drones???
-
@failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to 2026-06-02 12:56
@liaizon@social.wake.st "can we . ." no, not when there is that much money involved The foundation has revenue of . .gasp .. 180 million US dollars, give or take https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/200049703
-
@failedLyndonLaRouchite@mas.to 2026-06-02 12:56
@liaizon@social.wake.st "senior . ." seems like McCarthyism The US NSC is a large place, with some divergent views, and "advisor" can mean a lot of things
-
@EriogonumDarwin@mastodon.social 2026-06-02 14:20
@liaizon@social.wake.st The reply (x2 via zendesk, see my profile name) to my donation cancellation reads like the comms team at Walmart. Smells like a CEO relationship to Wikipedia to me.
-
@gekitsu@toot.cat 2026-06-02 14:41
@liaizon@social.wake.st i bet they are courting the cop from raspberry pi as we speak…
-
@Rickd6@mstdn.ca 2026-06-02 14:53
@liaizon@social.wake.st when they only hire/interview people who have been CEO’s for these positions what can you expect?
-
@taq@thicc.horse 2026-06-02 16:13
@liaizon@social.wake.st Sure we can, just kill em
-
@Beggarmidas@mastodon.social 2026-06-02 16:28
@liaizon@social.wake.st Eh....Boy have you got a weird read on that one. Unless you have evidence or proof to the contrary what that actually means is a free speech advocate is in a position to advise government about classification standards.
-
@not2b@sfba.social 2026-06-02 17:55
@liaizon@social.wake.st If someone needs to be in charge, pick someone whose career has been with libraries. Not a corporate shill or a spook.