Post #3017387
2026-06-01 06:54 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@belazor@lemmy.zip 2026-06-01 08:37
So there is no forced arrest and re-education to “convert” them? www.tandfonline.com/doi/…/03068374.2019.1672433 And there is no forced sterilisation either? newlinesinstitute.org/…/Chinas-Breaches-of-the-GC… You have provided a lot of statements with absolutely no sources to back up any of it. Why should anyone trust you over sources that can be looked up? I understand there is a lot of propaganda, but you have to understand that you are not immune to propaganda either. How can you be sure the things you read aren’t just propaganda too? Without sources, we can’t read and judge for ourselves. I hope you value critical thinking over groupthink. I realise not a lot of people will read this far down without downvoting and moving on, because I’m challenging the narrative I must be the enemy and a Leftist In Name Only. I want to make it absolutely clear that I’m not making any judgements about whether China is “worse” than the US or anything of the sort. Such a comparison is wrong because they’re independent events. Just because the US’ list of human rights abuses is long, doesn’t mean it’s okay for China to add to their list. It’s also not necessary to defend China, because even if everything we can read about the Uyghurs is true, that doesn’t change the fact that there are benefits to the Chinese way of running their country (100 year plan vs “until next election” 4 year plan, to name one) that we can strive towards. Let’s be honest; if we as leftists got a magic wand that could change the world, we wouldn’t (shouldn’t) use any country currently in existence as the perfect template, because no country and no current political system is perfect.
-
@poopsmith@lemmy.ml 2026-06-01 13:34
news.un.org/en/story/2022/08/1125932 I don’t think it’s fair to say that they “found no evidence of genocide.” If you have some other evidence of conclusions from the U.N.'s investigation, please provide them. It feels an awful lot like you’re mindlessly pushing pro-China propaganda. “[D]eradicalization practices” for “at-risk populations” sounds an awful lot like double-speak for torture and rape of an ethnic group, which seems to be what the U.N. actually found. Is there a population of people in China who were committing terrorist acts at a higher rate than the general population? Seems entirely plausible. Is the correct solution to torture and rape them? Absolutely not.