Post #3006803
2026-02-19 19:19 UTC
I did not try koboldcpp but gave it a try now.
I am not sure how to run the OpenCL backend, the wiki says "Vulkan is a newer option that provides a good balance of speed and utility compared to the OpenCL backend." cli arguments do not mention it.
The Vulkan backend seems marginally slower than the one of llama.cpp for GLM-4.7-Flash: 19.8 tps with FlashAttention, 29.8 without.
It seems koboldcpp is a fork of llama.cpp, maybe some Vulkan optimisations have not made it there, yet.
@localllama
Replies (0)
No replies.