← Feed
@djsumdog@djsumdog.com
Post #2999502
2026-05-31 03:13 UTC
The parents can block traffic (buy software or routers) with ease. Some might say, "well they'll just get around it." So? The parent can make their moral stance clear. They might even say, "I look at porn sometimes too, but I feel guilty because I know it's wrong," if they want to be honest.
That can instill the value, even if society can't really stop proliferation. The kid knows why their parents believe whatever and can choose to act on it or ignore it.
If the parent doesn't care .. then whatever. The kid can hold that value, or go all trad and reject it for themselves. Maybe it doesn't matter and the kid grows up fine? Maybe the grow up to live in a goon cave? Who knows?
That's why the age verification stuff is so BS. It's a backdoor to individual digital identities, under the guise of the anti-porns wanting to mandate their ideology on all the "don't cares" because "Reee! No, people are hurting their kids if they don't block their access; so we should block everyone's!"
Replies (1)
-
@djsumdog@djsumdog.com You don't need to tell me, I'm aware
But yeah, if they were serious about it, they'd make giving kids such devices child abuse, and police would go with confiscation (especially at school, in which, the school would wash their hands of the issue, meaning it's much easier to enforce). That would solve pretty much all of the problems and start morally enforcing it by proxy. The return of the desktop computer at home would also make it so that the next generation aren't computer retards again too as a bonus
Of course, some parents won't care, but that would be a start. The problem isn't quite porn itself, you probably heard a story of your father having a Hustler magazine under his bed. The problem is unchecked free access to everything under the sun, whenever, wherever
Open ##2999501