Post #2994894
2025-05-11 20:28 UTC
@ocean@raru.re
Ha! Knew it!
Not long ago I pointed out to someone that in a way, worse search results meant more time scrolling and ergo more ad impressions, so it wouldn't at all surprise me if they quit bothering to improve.
Fuckers. I'd assumed a sort of passive acceptance and laziness had led to degraded quality, but the fact that it was actually designed that way means there should be a "recall" of their product and they need to compensate me for all the wasted time before I finally gave up and went to DDG (which, IMO, has dropped significantly in quality since I started using it 🤔 ).
Thing is, look at ANY online business that makes money off of ad impressions and there is an immediately obvious incentive to find ways to increase your scrolling time on the site. Not all are scummy grifters, of course, but when the incentive is there, someone is going to take advantage of it.
Replies (1)
-
@Anne_Delong@musician.social 2025-05-11 21:01
@Mikal@sfba.social @ocean@raru.re Well, as with other companies, competition and product reviews are needed to link good service to profits. So maybe consumers should change up their search engines. Here's an article from PC Magazine that compares them: https://www.pcmag.com/picks/go-beyond-google-best-alternative-search-engines #searchengines