Post #2979772

2025-12-27 15:44 UTC

@Ardubal@mastodon.xyz @xChaos@f.cz well, it offers plenty of posibilities and people are creative🤷‍♂️ 😄 What is really annoying is huge group of "AI bad" screamers. I have absolutely nothing against constructive critigue. But the only purpose of those screams is to get attentions and shoulder pats from other screamers.

Replies (2)

@xChaos@f.cz 2025-12-27 15:49

@FoxVK@mastodon.cloud You have to probably count me among those "screamers". But I think it is time to categorize different types of screams. Simple checking yes or no is simplification... I added the options I believe, to some extent, to the poll and now I watch how important are those points of views to others. After all, screaming "no AI" really won't save us. We need to replace this vision by some positive utopia. Which may even need us to reduce our Internet and social network addiction, who knows... @Ardubal@mastodon.xyz

Open ##2979773
@Ardubal@mastodon.xyz 2025-12-27 17:25

@FoxVK@mastodon.cloud @xChaos@f.cz When machine learning (»bots«) surpassed top Go professionals a few years ago, we got new and fresh input for analysis, but also cheating became a problem. There was some commotion around that, but nobody criticizing the abuse of bots for cheating was accused of being anti-technology. Of course, nobody promised hundreds of billions of profit, and cheating wasn't the main activity around bots. But with LLMs this is the case. Now, who benefits from calling critics »screamers«?

Open ##2979774