Post #2969396

@jyn@tech.lgbt so what i was thinking of is, i noticed a few projects moving away from separate wikis and towards documentation stored in i.e. git, explicitly because of the PR/review workflow, but also because of atomic multi-file commits (currently wiki engines are cvs history for one file at a time). but that wiki workflow is a lot nicer for non-programmers as you know (you know, working wysiwyg, can do it from a browser, etc) i think what'd be interesting is reconciling that workflow with a PR based git workflow. stuff like word has a concept of inline review comments and i.e. track changes, it's "just" a matter of making them work together