Post #2969391
2026-05-06 20:57 UTC
@cb@social.treehouse.systems so my thought is that the WYSIWYG editor wouldn't go through a PR, that it would automatically commit to whatever branch you're editing. that means you need a UI to restrict permissions, but that seems ok to me? I think almost everyone in practice has a "docs that couldn't possibly fail the build" folder.
alternatively it could just checkpoint to localStorage until they hit "Save" at the top explicitly, and "Save" opens a PR for them. I don't think we need to worry about atomic commits for stuff like this, one commit is fine.
say more about sourcehut? I can't find any docs about it being modular on https://man.sr.ht/.
Replies (2)
-
@kouhai@social.treehouse.systems 2026-05-06 21:10
@jyn@tech.lgbt @cb@social.treehouse.systems > I think almost everyone in practice has a "docs that couldn't possibly fail the build" folder. docs are worth review! a quick stamp for smaller changes like typo fixes, but still worth review!
-
@cb@social.treehouse.systems 2026-05-07 14:30
@jyn@tech.lgbt wrt sourcehut i believe the components are modular (that is i.e. issues are a separate application from say docs) and could in theory be replaced with different ones