Post #2962832

@oscherler@tooting.ch @worik@mastodon.social > because the model is a useless piece of junk I often wonder when I read this kind of macho assertion, what's going to happen when the writer encounters evidence in their life that they are perhaps not entirely correct about things? If OP meant how the model is managed to iterate at one level or another is critical than it seems that so long as the model is "good enough", that feels like it could easily be.