Post #2955408

Potential Pregnancy, Actual Confusion https://jamesmacpherson.substack.com/p/potential-pregnancy-actual-confusion QUOTE Back then the Monty Python humour came from the fact that everyone understood the premise was insane. Fast forward to 2026 and the joke has become public policy. Here’s Australia’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody addressing Senate Estimates earlier this week … > If someone who applies for a job for example and it is a trans woman and she may be asked whether or not she intends to have children and if she replies ‘Yes I do’, and then doesn’t get the job because that employer doesn’t want to employ women who are of childbearing age, then she may have been subject to discrimination on the basis of potential pregnancy. So if I don’t employ a man in a dress because I’m worried that the man in the dress might become pregnant … I may have committed discrimination. Not on the basis that the man could actually become pregnant … we all know that’s ludicrous. But I may have committed discrimination on the basis of POTENTIAL pregnancy. In other words … I may be found guilty of not playing along. Sal Grover was recently found guilty of not playing along. Her crime was recognising Roxanne Tickle as a man. The Supreme Court ordered her to pay $20,000 for failing to participate in the trans charade. No-one seriously believes that men can become women. #auspol