Post #2942468

2025-09-06 18:22 UTC

@paco@infosec.exchange @IngloGamesDev@mastodon.gamedev.place You can make the same statement ("devastating consumption of resources to deliver mediocre or unusable results") about the vast majority of human activities, not just AI usage.

Replies (2)

@schmidt_fu@mstdn.social 2025-09-12 05:29

@mihai@ioc.exchange Yes, take cars for example: They make you 10x-100x as productive in carrying stuff - and now we're carrying 10x-100x as much stuff (and even more, ~Jevon's Paradox) *needlessly* around. @paco@infosec.exchange @IngloGamesDev@mastodon.gamedev.place

Open ##2942469
@dzwiedziu@mastodon.social 2025-09-12 06:25

@mihai@ioc.exchange Then why add AI slop to the mix? In your equivocation it's as bad as humanity and you don't dispute the 10× resource use. So not only it's still wasteful it's redundant. (I'll mercifully skip deconstructing the rather offensive and ecofash-smelling argument, that humanity is somehow wholly responsible for devastation and equal to elite-forced slopification of technology.) @paco@infosec.exchange @IngloGamesDev@mastodon.gamedev.place

Open ##2942470