Elektrine lite

← Feed

@pieter@mathstodon.xyz

Post #2923561

2026-04-28 23:39 UTC

As Arnaud Cheritat explains here https://www.math.univ-toulouse.fr/~cheritat/2023-monotile/4D-lift/page-4.html, given a tiling in the Hat or Spectre* family, you can construct a MLD tiling of hexagons and rhombs (see also @mathBlock@mathstodon.xyz (https://mathblock8128.wordpress.com/2023/09/16/spar-lines-hexagons-and-tiling-a-finite-boundary/, Fig 22) and @jsmith@mathstodon.xyz (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.01911, Fig 3.1) who point out that there is a aperiodic set of prototiles consisting of a rhomb and two types of comets with directed, coloured edges). Given a base vertex, you can assign to each vertex in a comet-rhomb tiling a pair of complex numbers in \(\Lambda^2\), where \(\Lambda = \mathbb{Z}[\xi]\) (\(\xi = e^{2\pi i/6}\)) is the set of Eisenstein integers. By including edges, we obtain a directed graph with vertices in \(\Lambda^2\). This is the 'lift' of the tiling. A tiling using a particular tile set in the Hat or Spectre family is then a projection of this graph, where the hat tile corresponds to projecting onto \((1,-1)\) and the turtle with projecting onto \((1,\xi^2)\). [You could also do this using the vertices of the hat tile, but I find the comet-rhomb version simpler since there aren't as many points, and projections to tiles in the hat family are all of the form \((1, \sigma) \) for \(\sigma \in \mathbb{C}\) of modulus 1.] *By the Spectre family, I mean tilings using Tile(\(a,b\)) and Tile(\(b,a\)) (in the notation of https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.10798) with appropriately marked edges (2/n)

Replies (1)

  • @pieter@mathstodon.xyz 2026-04-29 00:29

    The deflation operation can be abelianised (in some sense) to give a 2 x 2 complex matrix with eigenvalues \(\phi\) and \(\phi^{-1}\), where \(\phi\) is the square of the golden mean. If we project the lifted centres of tiles with more frequent handedness onto the left eigenspace of \(\phi^{-1}\) (spanned by \((1, -\xi\phi)\)) and colour the projected points according to the orientation of the tile, we get a pattern which is the superposition of the two triangles shown, translated so their centres coincide. On the other hand, consider the projection onto the first coordinate. For a given tile centre, we can track its position as we continuously deform the projection from that eigenspace projection to the \((1,0)\) projection, and we can translate the region that the eigenspace projection of the point landed in as we do so, keeping the relative position of the projected point within the region fixed. This spreads out the regions, and we obtain the periodic pattern shown in the second image. I've overlain this with hexagons, which are the images of the tiles with more frequent handedness under this projection. A short line indicates the orientation of the lifted tile. In the notation of the previous post, these lines extend from \((0,0)\) towards \((\xi^2,0)\) (for a tile in that particular orientation) (3/n)

    Open ##2923562