Post #2915242
2026-01-07 02:08 UTC
OED:
> 1. totally or partially resistant to a particular infectious disease or pathogen.
> 2. protected or exempt, especially from an obligation or the effects of something.
Merriam Webster
> 1. : not susceptible or responsive
>
> especially: having a high degree of resistance to a disease
> 2. a: produced by, involved in, or concerned with immunity or an immune response
>
> b: having or producing antibodies or lymphocytes capable of reacting with a specific antigen
> 3. a: marked by protection
>
> b: free, exempt
So unless you pretend that MW's 2b sense is the only valid one, the immunity is immunity.
If you have a sample of HIV at 37°C in blood, but with all the immune cells removed, it'll still all become inert after around a week simply due to chemical reactions with other components of blood etc.. It's pretty comparable to a population of animals - if you take away their ability to reproduce, they'll die of old age when left for long enough even if you're not actively killing them.
*Edit: fat-fingered the save button while previewing the formatting*
Replies (1)
-
@Fedizen@lemmy.world 2026-01-07 17:57
Context is how you determine definitions. This is not hard. We're not talking about legal immunity here.