Elektrine lite

← Feed

@AnyOldName3@lemmy.world

Post #2915225

2026-01-06 12:48 UTC

If he got incredibly lucky, they're immune to AIDS. It's much more likely that they're not and will develop symptoms of new and exciting genetic disorders never seen before. The biggest problem was that the technique used is really unreliable, so you'd expect off-target edits to be more common than on-target ones for a human-sized genome. For bacteria, you can get around it by letting the modified bacteria reproduce for a few generations, then testing most of them. If they're all good, then it worked, and if any aren't, you need to make a new batch. Testing DNA destroys the cells you're testing, so if you test enough cells in a human embryo to be sure that the edits worked, it dies. You can't just start when the embryo is a single cell to ensure that the whole thing's been edited in the same way as you need to test something pre-edit to be able to detect off-target edits.

Replies (2)

  • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2026-01-06 14:26

    >Testing DNA destroys the cells you're testing, so if you test enough cells in a human embryo to be sure that the edits worked, it dies. I feel like we're ignoring the obvious solution here. Stick the kids with an AIDS needle and see what happens! /s

    Open ##2915229

  • @SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2026-01-06 15:35

    They are not immune to HIV. They lack the receptor for HIV. Many people lack this receptor naturally.

    Open ##2915230