Post #2915108
2026-02-06 12:04 UTC
Seems to me, for most successful companies, it does. Can you name a few successful companies past 50, making money, that don't have management?
There is little to no evidence, even in academic studies, typically a pro labor progressive environment, that management is not needed beyond small projects.
Replies (3)
-
@shrugs@lemmy.world 2026-02-07 00:51
Valve. Checkmate https://ebsedu.org/blog/boss-less-management-a-peek-into-the-flat-hierarchy-of-valve/ https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/pc-gaming/valve-makes-almost-usd50-million-per-employee-raking-in-more-cash-per-person-than-google-amazon-or-microsoft-gaming-giants-350-employees-on-track-to-generate-usd17-billion-this-year
-
@mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2026-02-07 02:45
Jesus, you're an insufferable asshole. And one that has no idea what they're talking about at that. Look up the Dunning-Krueger Effect. That's literally your post history, particularly here
-
@drkt@scribe.disroot.org 2026-02-06 12:07
I didn't say management wasn't needed.